Appalachian Center
Appalachian Center
Home
About the Center
Poll Results
Issues
 
Coal
Air
Water
Economics
Mine Safety
More...
Accomplishments
Center in the Media
Support the Center
Sign Up/Contact Us

Archived Coal Issues:
August 2005
April 2004
Nov 2003

Archived Issues: Coal
November 2003

NW21 Pemits
Permit challenge
Mettiki Appeal
Draft EIS

Litigation filed to stop the Army Corps of Engineers from rubber-stamping massive coal mining operations by using it's Nationwide Permit #21(NWP21).  October 23, 2003.
The first of our new court actions was filed on behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Counsel in Washington, D.C., the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, and Coal River Mountain Watch. Center lawyers are challenging the inadequacies of the Corps' current permitting practices. The main focus of the complaint concerns the Corps' failure to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in its illegal use of the Nationwide 21 general permit (NW21) to authorize large or multiple valley fills that will have devastating impacts on our environment and communities.

As you know, these valley fills bury hundreds of miles of valuable headwater streams in the region. The Mountaintop Removal Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) currently being conducted by several federal and state agencies conservatively estimates 1200 miles throughout the Appalachian region have already been destroyed. To date, all but one of these valley fills in West Virginia have been authorized by the Corps using NW21. In our view, this is a clear violation of NEPA and the Clean Water Act which both require the Corps to forgo the use of these rubber-stamp authorizations for activities that will have more than minimal environmental impact. Just imagine, the Corps' entire permitting scheme for mountaintop removal mines is based on the assumption that these mines have minimal impacts on the environment! The Corps has so twisted the law that it believes it may authorize even the most destructive mines with little or no environmental scrutiny. We believe that even the United States Army Corps must follow the laws passed by Congress and we intend to force the Corps to comply with the Clean Water Act and with NEPA, even if the Corps would prefer to ignore them.

In granting these permits the Corps is also allowing for the elimination of hundreds of acres of upland forest and streamside riparian areas that are essential to the ecological health of our streams. The use of NW21 has already allowed nearly 1 million acres of the most productive and diverse temperate hardwood forests in the world to be permitted for destruction without regard for the cumulative impacts on the region's economy or resources. It is estimated that that number could reach 1.5 million acres in the next decade.

Permit appeal challenges WV Division of Environmental Protection (WVDEP)'s avoidance of Buffer Zone, Selenium and Topsoil Substitute issues.  October 29, 2003.
The second of our recent actions is an appeal filed with the Surface Mine Board of a permit issued to CoalMac Coal Company in Logan County. Filed on behalf of the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy and its members in the Island Creek area of Logan County, the appeal challenges the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection's approval of CoalMac's Phoenix #4 mine. WVDEP's action ignores the legal ban on mining within 100 feet of a stream (the buffer zone rule), the potential for toxic selenium discharges from the mine, and the inadequacy of the approved topsoil substitute to support the proposed forestland post mining land use. This appeal would compel the state WVDEP to enforce laws intended to protect the public from toxic water contamination that results from many of these mines and to enforce laws intended to protect the streams and forests at this and all future mine sites.

This will be a landmark case in our efforts to rein in mountaintop removal - win or lose. We believe the buffer zone rule prohibits filling intermittent and perennial streams. If we are successful in persuading the State courts in West Virginia that our interpretation of the law is the correct one, the size of strip mines in the State will be significantly reduced and reclamation practices will be improved so that the sites will actually support mixed native hardwood forests after mining.

Intervention in the industry appeal of WVDEP's denial of a mine permit that threatens the Potomac and Blackwater Rivers.  October 15, 2003.
We are pleased to report that WVDEP - despite significant pressure from coal industry lawyers - denied a permit for the large and controversial Mettiki Coal's "E" mine. The proposed underground operation would mine beneath tributaries of the Potomac and Blackwater Rivers. The targeted coal seam is highly acid producing. WVDEP's denial upholds current federal and state policies and regulations outlawing mining operations that will result in long term acid mine drainage (AMD).

Though media attention to AMD has dwindled with the more recent shift to mining in lower sulfur coal seams and the massively destructive mountaintop removal operations, long term AMD from mining in acid prone areas in the 1980's and 90's has left a devastating legacy. Low pH, and heavy loads of metals including iron, manganese and aluminum from those operations have killed thousands of miles of streams and created astronomical treatment costs, as well as large deficits in state reclamation funds (predicted to be in the millions of dollars in West Virginia alone). Extensive pools of acid water have also flooded underground mine workings in northern West Virginia and the pressure in these pools has begun to force the acid water to break out into streams and wells further contaminating waters in the area.

Permitting the Mettiki "E" mine will once again open the door for additional mining throughout acid prone areas across the country and further destruction of surface and ground waters for recreational, domestic and industrial use in major portions of PA, WV, KY, Tenn. Ill. and Ohio.

Now, Governor Wise's former Chief of Staff has joined ranks with Mettiki Coal Company and continues to pressure WVDEP to back down on the denial. Yielding to pressure to reverse this decision will turn back the clock on decades of work by citizens across the state, region and nation to hold firm the sections of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act and the Clean Water Act that prohibit the production of AMD. To assure that federal and state law are strictly adhered to, Center lawyers have intervened in support of WVDEP on behalf of three state groups: WV Rivers Coalition, Trout Unlimited and WV Highlands Conservancy.

NEWBREAK: The center has filed an appeal on this case go to ISSUES: COAL

DRAFT EIS.
Center staff continues to digest and assess the nearly 5,000 page Draft Environmental Impact Statement on Mountaintop Removal Coal Mining and Valley Fills in preparation for filing very substantial comments on the document by the January 6, 2003 deadline. We are also preparing a court challenge to the EIS, in the likely event it will fail to comply with NEPA.

Back to top