|
This news story originally provided by
The
Charleston Gazette
By
Ken Ward Jr.
Staff writer
Three environmental groups filed suit Thursday to expand new
restrictions on mountaintop removal permits to the coalfields of
Kentucky.
If successful, the lawsuit would stop new mining operations in
Kentucky from being approved through a streamlined permit process
meant for activities that cause little environmental harm.
Since last July, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ officials in West
Virginia have been blocked from streamlined approval of new
mountaintop removal valley fills.
In West Virginia, coal companies must go through detailed,
individual permit reviews when they propose to bury streams with
waste dirt and rock.
But in Kentucky, the corps continues to approve new valley fills
through much less rigorous “general” or “nationwide” permit
authorizations.
“We’re trying to make the law the same in both states,” said Jim
Hecker, environmental enforcement director for Trial Lawyers for
Public Justice.
Hecker is among the lawyers who filed the new suit Thursday in
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky in
Lexington. Judge Jennifer B. Coffman, a Clinton appointee, was
assigned to hear the matter.
The case was filed on behalf of Kentucky Riverkeeper Inc.,
Kentuckians for the Commonwealth and the Kentucky Waterways
Alliance.
The groups are also represented by Lexington lawyer Joe Childers,
Joe Lovett of the Appalachian Center for the Economy and the
Environment, and Brent Bowker and Amanda Moore of the Appalachian
Citizens Law Center in Prestonsburg, Ky.
With the new suit, environmental groups are trying to block
streamlined permitting of mountaintop removal jobs that would bury
streams in the Cumberland, Kentucky, Big Sandy and Licking River
watersheds.
“What’s illegal in West Virginia is just as illegal in Kentucky,”
Lovett said.
In mountaintop removal, coal operators blast off entire hilltops
to uncover valuable low-sulfur coal seams. Leftover rock and dirt —
the stuff that used to be the mountains — is shoved into nearby
valleys, burying streams.
A 2003 draft study by federal regulators found that 1,200 miles
of Appalachian streams have been buried or otherwise “directly
impacted” by valley fills between 1992 and 2002. That 4 1/2-year
study found that past, present and future mining in the region could
destroy 1.4 million acres of forest, or 11.5 percent of the study
area.
“We need to slow down the mining so it’s done in a way that
doesn’t hurt people or destroy the land,” said Patsy Carter, a
Martin County, Ky., resident and member of Kentuckians for the
Commonwealth.
Bill Caylor, president of the Kentucky Coal Association, was not
in his office Thursday afternoon and could not be reached for
comment.
Corps officials had no immediate comment on the new lawsuit.
Like the West Virginia case, the Kentucky suit questions the
corps’ historic practice of approving valley fills through a Clean
Water Act authorization called Nationwide Permit 21, or NWP21.
Under the law, such permits are supposed to be used only to
approve categories of activities that, cumulatively, would have
minimal environmental effects.
In a July 8 opinion, U.S. District Judge Joseph R. Goodwin in
Charleston ruled that the corps had never concluded that valley
fills caused only minimal adverse impacts.
Without such a finding, the judge said, the corps cannot use NWP
21 for any mining permits.
The Bush administration and several mining industry groups have
appealed Goodwin’s ruling to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
in Richmond, Va. The first legal briefs are due early next month,
but no oral argument has yet been scheduled.
Previously, the 4th Circuit overturned two rulings that the late
U.S. District Judge Charles H. Haden II issued to tighten
restrictions on mountaintop removal.
In one of those cases, the 4th Circuit complained that Haden had
issued an overly broad injunction against certain types of new
mining permits in West Virginia and Kentucky.
So, in his ruling, Goodwin narrowed his injunction to permit
applications in the southern judicial circuit of West Virginia.
Meanwhile, coal companies in Kentucky can continue to obtain
valley permits through the streamlined, NWP 21 process.
In their new suit, environmental groups seek a ruling similar to
Goodwin’s from a federal judge in Kentucky.
Lawyers argued in court papers that the corps never properly
studied mountaintop removal’s impacts before approving NWP 21 and
failed to put any limits on the length of stream that could be
buried and qualify as “minimal” impact to the environment.
If the suit is successful, any industry appeal would go to a
different court, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in
Cincinnati.
In Kentucky, the corps has has approved more than 50 mining
projects through streamlined Clean Water Act permits since March
2002, the lawsuit states.
Those projects would disturb more than 55 square miles and bury
more than 35 miles of streams beneath nearly 200 valley fills, the
suit states.
Another 27 permit applications are pending. But, corps records
include estimated fill lengths for only a third of those permits.
Those would bury about 9 miles of streams.
To contact staff writer Ken Ward Jr., use e-mail or call
348-1702.
|