|
This news story originally provided by
The
Charleston Gazette
By Ken Ward Jr.
Staff writer
Aracoma Coal Co. wants to mine 12.5 million tons of coal
from the hills around historic Blair Mountain, near Ethel in
Logan County.
In the process, the Massey Energy subsidiary would bury
nearly 3 miles of streams. Over the next eight years,
millions of tons of waste rock and dirt would be dumped into
Camp Branch and Dingess Run.
When it approved the proposal in July, the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers concluded that Aracoma’s plan “does not
significantly affect the quality of the human environment.”
On Thursday, three West Virginia environmental groups
filed a lawsuit challenging the corps finding.
In their suit, the groups argue the effects are massive
and warranted a detailed environmental impact study before
Aracoma was granted its permit.
The 25-page suit launched another major legal attack on
mountaintop removal coal mining in Appalachia.
If successful, the case could force federal regulators to
perform detailed and time-consuming studies before issuing
any new mining permits. At the same time, it could require
government agencies to more fully examine potential impacts
on forests and streams, and consider those before deciding
to allow mining.
“It’s painfully obvious that the corps is acting without
regard to the law by ignoring the individual, let alone
cumulative, effects of valley fills on the natural resources
and communities in the coalfields,” said Cindy Rank, mining
chairwoman for the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy. “The
corps isn’t bothering to review and evaluate the destruction
it is permitting.”
The conservancy, along with the Ohio Valley Environmental
Coalition and Coal River Mountain Watch, filed the suit in
U.S. District Court in Huntington. It had not yet been
assigned to a judge late Thursday afternoon.
The environmental groups are represented by Joe Lovett of
the Appalachian Center for the Economy and the Environment
and by Stephen Roady and Jennifer Chavez of the
Washington-based group Earthjustice.
Earlier this week, environmental group lawyers defended
on appeal a ruling by U.S. District Judge Joseph R. Goodwin
to block the corps from reviewing valley fill proposals
through a streamlined “general permit” process.
In the new case, the groups argue the corps was wrong to
approve Aracoma’s mining application through a more detailed
“individual permit” review because that review did not
include a study called an Environmental Impact Statement, or
EIS.
The suit also alleges that, in approving the Aracoma
permit, the corps violated its own Clean Water Act
regulations prohibiting discharges “which will cause or
contribute to significant degradation” of streams.
In the suit, the groups target Aracoma’s Camp Branch
Surface Mine. The Massey proposal has already been
controversial because of its location near the site of the
1921 Battle of Blair Mountain, which is being considered for
the National Register of Historic Places.
Massey first obtained a nearly 1,000-acre permit for the
operation in July 1991, according to state Department of
Environmental Protection records.
Since then, the company has at least twice scaled back
the size of the proposal to appease state and federal
regulators.
Three of the original eight valley fills have been
eliminated, including one specifically to avoid part of the
area being considered for the historic site, records show.
The length of stream affected has dropped by about 20
percent, the records show.
Still, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the
state Division of Natural Resources and the federal Fish and
Wildlife Service expressed reservations about the mining
proposal.
In their suit, the environmentalists say the corps failed
to take the “hard look” at these potential impacts that is
required by the National Environmental Policy Act, or NEPA.
Under NEPA, federal agencies are required to prepare
environmental impact statements “for every major federal
action significantly affecting the quality of the human
environment.”
Corps of Engineers spokeswoman Candy Walters referred
calls to the U.S. Department of Justice. A spokeswoman there
did not immediately return a phone call.
To contact staff writer Ken Ward Jr., use e-mail or
call 348-1702. |