Appalachian Center
Appalachian Center
Home
About the Center
Poll Results
Issues
 
Coal
Air
Water
Economics
Mine Safety
More...
Accomplishments
Center in the Media
Support the Center
Sign Up/Contact Us

Center in the Media
News Archive
(Listing with summaries)
2007 - 2008
2006
2005
2004

News Archive
(Headlines only)
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004

 

Appalachian Center in the Media Archive: 2005

State Articles:

Since the Center’s inception in 2001, its work has been extensively covered by West Virginia's largest newspaper, the Charleston Gazette. Please visit their archives for a comprehensive look at the Appalachian Center and the issues it confronts. Of special interest in the Charleston Gazette is Mining the Mountains, a comprehensive and ongoing series of stories on mountaintop removal mining that frequently feature the Center’s work.

  • State asked to get tough on mercury pollution  The West Virginia Rivers Coalition on Thursday asked a state board to crack down on mercury pollution from West Virginia’s largest source of the potent neurotoxin.  Coalition lawyers asked the state Environmental Quality Board to slash the amount of mercury the PPG Industries plant at Natrium can discharge into the Ohio River.  Joe Lovett, a coalition lawyer, asked the board to throw out a two-year waiver of tougher, new mercury limits in the latest version of PPG’s state water pollution permit. Charleston Gazette, December 16, 2005

  • New mine permits gain speed; Bush administration issues final mountaintop removal study  New mine permits gain speed; Bush administration issues final mountaintop removal study, Federal regulators Friday released the final version of a landmark study of mountaintop removal, paving the way for the Bush administration’s plan to streamline the review of new coal-mining permits. The study approves the original proposal to combine the review for mining permits required by various state and federal agencies into a single, joint evaluation. Charleston Gazette, October 29, 2005.

  • The mountaintop removal study  The mountaintop removal study , A timeline, Charleston Gazette, October 29, 2005.

  • Pollution; Washington obstacle  DISTURBINGLY, the Bush administration in Washington seems to be blocking some federal experts in West Virginia from trying to prevent acid mine drainage that turns creeks orange, devoid of life. At issue is a proposed Mettiki Coal Co. mine on the Grant-Tucker county line. Two years ago, the state Department of Environmental Protection denied a permit, saying the mine would be a perpetual source of acid seepage. Charleston Gazette, October 27,2005.

  • OSM blocked from probe into Mettiki mine permit  Interior Department officials have blocked the federal Office of Surface Mining from investigating a West Virginia coal mine that OSM fears would eventually pour acid mine drainage into streams. Charleston Gazette, October 26, 2005

  • Lawsuit seeks more study on Blair Mountain mining permit  Aracoma Coal Co. wants to mine 12.5 million tons of coal from the hills around historic Blair Mountain, near Ethel in Logan County. In the process, the Massey Energy subsidiary would bury nearly 3 miles of streams. Over the next eight years, millions of tons of waste rock and dirt would be dumped into Camp Branch and Dingess Run. When it approved the proposal in July, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers concluded that Aracoma’s plan “does not significantly affect the quality of the human environment.” On Thursday, three West Virginia environmental groups filed a lawsuit challenging the corps finding. Charleston Gazette, September 23, 2005.

  • Environmentalists challenge Blair Mountain mining permit  Three environmental groups have filed a federal lawsuit challenging a mountaintop removal mining permit granted to a Massey Energy subsidiary to extract 12.5 million tons of coal from the hills around historic Blair Mountain. Charleston Gazette, September 22, 2005

  • Mettiki permit flawed, feds say  Federal regulators have found dozens of major problems with a Mettiki Coal Co. underground mine permit that the state Department of Environmental Protection already approved. The U.S. Office of Surface Mining findings back up complaints from state environmental groups, who fear the mine will eventually pour acid mine drainage into streams. Charleston Gazette, September 21, 2005.

  • Mountaintop removal fight returns to appeals court  Mountaintop removal fight returns to appeals court, Does mountaintop removal coal mining cause only minimal damage to West Virginia’s hills, forests and streams? On Monday, a federal appeals court will consider that question. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals is scheduled to hear arguments in the latest legal effort to more strictly regulate Appalachian strip mining. Charleston Gazette, September 18, 2005.

  • DEP slow to tighten limits on mercury in water; PPG plant escapes tougher permit terms  NATRIUM — Just north of New Martinsville along W.Va. 2, a two-story, wooden gazebo stands at the “PPG Wildlife Management Area.” There are picnic tables, a walking path and a small pond formed by Ohio River backwater. Signs alert visitors to look for cardinals, gray squirrels, skunks and other animals. Charleston Gazette, August 15, 2005.

  • DEP; Chronic bungling  After the state Department of Environmental Protection realized that it had based a Raleigh County surface mining permit on erroneous maps, the agency sprang into action. I rescinded a recent permit letting Goals Coal Co. add a second silo near Marsh Fork Elementary School and ordered the company to remove its foundation. Charleston Gazette, Editorial, August 12, 2005.

  • Group wants boundary violation notice in silo case  State regulators may have taken the wrong enforcement action to stop construction of one of two Massey Energy coal storage silos near a Raleigh County elementary school, a citizens group said Tuesday. In a new notice of intent to sue, Coal River Mountain Watch said “it is still unclear under what legal authority” the state Department of Environmental Protection rescinded the silo permit. Instead, the group said, DEP Secretary Stephanie Timmermeyer should have cited Massey subsidiary Goals Coal Co. for mining outside its legal permit boundary. Charleston Gazette, August 10, 2005.

  • Citizens group intervenes in Massey silo case  The state Surface Mine Board has allowed a Raleigh County citizens group to intervene in a case over a Massey Energy coal silo under construction adjacent to a local elementary school. Whitesville-based Coal River Mountain Watch sought to join the case to defend a state order that blocked the silo at Massey’s Goals Coal Co. subsidiary near Sundial. Charleston Gazette, August 4, 2005.

  • Massey seeks stay of order to remove silo foundation Lawyers for Massey Energy on Tuesday asked a state board to temporarily suspend an order that requires the company to rip up the foundation of a coal silo under construction adjacent to a Raleigh County elementary school. Massey lawyers urged the state Surface Mine Board to block the order until board members can hear a full appeal of the Department of Environmental Protection order. Charleston Gazette, August 3, 2005

  • State buffer rule weaker than federal  West Virginia’s rule to block new strip mining operations near schools, churches and homes is weaker than required by federal law, government records show. State Department of Environmental Protection officials have never adopted a tougher legal standard finalized six years ago by the Clinton administration. The U.S. Office of Surface Mining has never forced the state to act. Charleston Gazette. July 31, 2005

  • Appeals court sets argument in mining case  A federal appeals court has scheduled a September oral argument in a challenge to the latest ruling to limit mountaintop removal coal mining. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals scheduled the argument for Sept. 19 in Richmond, Va., court records show. Under court rules, the names of the three judges who will hear the case will not be announced until that morning. Charleston Gazette. July 29, 2005

  • Massey to appeal DEP silo order  Massey Energy will appeal an order that blocked construction of one of two coal storage silos near a Raleigh County elementary school, company lawyers told state regulators Thursday. Massey lawyers also are expected to seek an emergency ruling from the West Virginia Surface Mine Board, state Department of Environmental Protection officials said. Charleston Gazette, July 29, 2005

  • Both Massey silos off permit, DEP says survey shows  Both of Massey Energy’s controversial coal silos near Marsh Fork Elementary School are outside the original permit boundary shown on company maps, a state Department of Environmental Protection official says an agency survey has confirmed.  The site for the second silo — which has not yet been completed — sits entirely outside the permit boundary, according to the survey released Tuesday night.  The permit boundary line runs through the middle of the first silo, which was approved by DEP in June 2003 and is completed, the survey shows.  Charleston Gazette, July 28, 2005.

  • Manchin defends DEP on Massey silo permit  Gov. Joe Manchin on Wednesday defended his administration’s handling of the controversy over two new Massey Energy coal-storage silos in Raleigh County. Manchin said that he has not lost any confidence in the state Department of Environmental Protection. Charleston Gazette. July 21, 2005.

  • DEP criticized over Massey silo Complaints of proximity to school ignored, boundary advances overlooked, Raleigh residents say . Charleston Gazette, July 17, 2005.

  • DEP halts Massey silo project  Maps show facility outside site’s original permit area, Charleston Gazette, July 16, 2005.

  • OSM delays changes to buffer zone rule   Bush administration officials announced Thursday that they will conduct a detailed environmental study before they scrap a federal rule that prohibits coal mining within 100 feet of streams. The study could delay the rule change for two years or more. The change had been strongly pushed by the coal industry. Charleston Gazette, June 17, 2005.

  • Quarry hearing begins; Need for valley fill not proven, residents’ engineer says  Three years ago, Stephanie Connolly and her husband moved to their house off U.S. 33 east of Elkins so they could live near Shavers Fork, in the shadow of the Monongahela National Forest. Now, the J.F. Allen Co. wants to move in right across the road. Charleston Gazette, May 11, 2005

  • Quarry permit appeal to be heard this week  FAULKNER — Pat Gallagher pointed at a spot on the topographic map. Chairman Tom Michael and other members of the state Surface Mine Board gathered around to see.  Then, Gallagher wheeled his arm across the old logging road at a mountain chocked full of Greenbrier Limestone.  The J.F. Allen Co. hopes to turn this Randolph County hillside into a huge limestone quarry. Michael and his fellow board members came for a guided tour. Charleston Gazette, May 08, 2005

  • Mining damage far from ‘minimal,’ environmentalist lawyers tell court  Damage to streams and forests from mountaintop removal coal mining is far from minimal, lawyers for environmental groups have told a federal appeals court. Lawyers for the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition and other groups urged the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold a federal court ruling to make mining permits harder to get. Charleston Gazette, May 6, 2005

  • Environmentalists seek ruling in Kentucky fill case  Environmental group lawyers are wasting no time in seeking a ruling in a lawsuit aimed at curbing mountaintop removal in Kentucky. The lawyers want to expand a West Virginia court order that banned a streamlined process for obtaining new mining permits. Charleston Gazette, March 15, 2005.

  • A different tack on mercury  In West Virginia, an environmental group is trying a different tack to get the toxic metal removed from the state’s rivers and streams.  The Appalachian Center for the Economy and the Environment wants the EPA to force the state to toughen its water pollution limits for mercury.  Charleston Gazette, March 13, 2005

  • Aluminum committee told to meet in public   A state Environmental Quality Board committee that is helping to rewrite West Virginia’s water pollution limit for aluminum must comply with the state open meetings law. Charleston Gazette, March 4, 2005.

  • Mine board told to merge with other boards  A Kanawha County judge has
    ordered the state Surface Mine Board to comply with a decade-old law that
    requires it to merge with two other state environmental panels. Charleston
    Gazette,February 12, 2005.

  • Lawsuit would expand valley fill limits to Kentucky  Three environmental groups filed suit Thursday to expand new restrictions on mountaintop removal permits to the coalfields of Kentucky.If successful, the lawsuit would stop new mining operations in Kentucky from being approved through a streamlined permit process meant for activities that cause little environmental harm. Charleston Gazette, January 28, 2005.


Back to top