Appalachian Center
Appalachian Center
Home
About the Center
Poll Results
Issues
 
Coal
Air
Water
Economics
Mine Safety
More...
Accomplishments
Center in the Media
Support the Center
Sign Up/Contact Us

 

Media
July 18, 2006


This news story originally provided by The Charleston Gazette

Coal pushed for energy independence

Regional cooperative of energy-producing states elects Manchin chairman

By Scott Finn
Staff writer

Gov. Joe Manchin was elected chairman Monday of the Southern States Energy Board, a regional group that represents some of the country’s biggest oil-, gas- and coal-producing states.

On Monday, the group released a 211-page report calling for a host of tax breaks, government-insurance programs and other incentives to help coal replace foreign oil supplies.

Manchin took up the theme of “energy independence” in accepting the new position.

“Our states, our region and our country are at an energy crossroads. We must chart a new course to supply more of our own energy resources to be more energy-independent,” he said.

The SSEB is a nonprofit organization that conducts research and develops energy policy for 16 states and two territories: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, the Virgin Islands, Virginia and West Virginia.

The group’s “American Energy Security Study” calls for a national plan to convert coal into liquid fuel. That technology has existed for decades but has not been widely used because of its cost.

With rising gas prices and volatility in the Middle East, liquid fuel from coal makes sense now, according to the report.

In particular, federal and state taxpayers should provide incentives to private investors to build plants that turn coal into fuel, it says.

Those incentives could include tax credits, federal loan guarantees, and a government-sponsored insurance program for private investors in alternative fuel plants.

Congress should provide $500 million for the U.S. Department of Defense’s alternative-fuels program, the report says.

Also, state taxpayers should provide grants and loans to match private investments early on because “the highest risk in any project is in early stage development,” the report says.

But money is not all. Regulators should make it easier for companies to receive permits for environmental and safety issues, it says.

“Permitting processes will need to be standardized to the extent possible and streamlined to the maximum, while simultaneously allowing adequate public scrutiny and input,” it says.

All this can be done without new environmental regulations, the report says. Mountaintop-removal mining and other such “indirect environmental considerations” of coal mining “can be addressed using mitigation measures already in place.”

For example, hardwood forests could grow on former mine sites if coal operators changed current practices, the report says. Virginia Tech research shows how mining companies could save topsoil and change mining practices so they can return barren scrubland back into forest.

The report says all this should happen voluntarily. “We encourage mining regulatory authorities and mining companies to advance remining and reforestation programs,” it says.

Coal companies don’t reforest much of their land because it costs more and takes more time, said Margaret Janes, senior policy analyst for the Appalachian Center for the Economy and the Environment in Lewisburg.

“They won’t reforest the land until state and federal regulators require them to do it,” she said. “If you go up on almost any reclaimed mine site today, all you’ll see is a barren scrubland.”

Janes questioned claims that such technology would result in lower carbon dioxide levels or less pollution in general.

“Clean coal is a total myth. Coal is a dirty, nasty fuel. It should be thought of only as a transition fuel until we conserve energy and develop true alternative fuels like wind and solar energy.”

Several states are competing for new alternative-fuel plants. In October, Manchin launched an initiative to build a “coal conversion” plant in West Virginia.

This new type of plant could turn coal into several products, including diesel fuel, jet fuel, natural gas, chemicals and hydrogen, he said.

West Virginia’s facility would be a “polygen” plant, flexible enough to produce different products at different times, he said.

Manchin and state lawmakers resurrected the Public Energy Authority to encourage such projects. Authority members are assessing the market, looking at the available technology and talking with potential investors, said Pat Esposito, Manchin’s energy adviser.

“Our current thought is, with the ongoing increase in crude oil and gasoline prices, transportation fuels provide the best opportunities,” Esposito said.

State officials are not planning any special incentives to lure the industry here, Esposito said.

“Most of those incentives will have to come from the federal level,” he said.

On the Web:

www.americanenergysecurity.org

To contact staff writer Scott Finn, use e-mail or call 357-4323.

 

Back to top