Appalachian Center
Appalachian Center
Home
About the Center
Poll Results
Issues
 
Coal
Air
Water
Economics
Mine Safety
More...
Accomplishments
Center in the Media
Support the Center
Sign Up/Contact Us

 

Media
April 18, 2007

This news article originally provided by The Charleston Gazette

Parts of mining ruling suspended

By Ken Ward Jr.
Staff writer

A federal judge on Tuesday suspended parts of his ruling that blocked four Massey Energy mountaintop removal mining permits.

U.S. District Judge Robert C. Chambers ruled that Massey can continue to dump waste rock and dirt into valley fills already started at three of the four operations.

“Most of the substantial harm plaintiffs complain about has already occurred,” Chambers said. “It cannot be undone.”

The judge ruled at the end of a two-hour hearing in Charleston.

A standing-room-only crowd of Massey miners, along with some environmental activists, filled the courtroom.

Last week, Massey asked Chambers to suspend his ruling pending an appeal. The company had already laid off 66 miners at one of the operations covered, and said it anticipated more job losses if the ruling stood.

In his Tuesday decision, announced from the bench, Chambers said that Massey’s Aracoma Coal Co. subsidiary could continue to dump waste into fills at its Camp Branch Mine in Logan County.

Chambers also declined a request by environmental groups, refusing to block the company from also expanding its mining — but not filling — operations into an undisturbed part of the Camp Branch site.

Chambers also allowed Massey to continue dumping waste into fills at its Black Castle Mine in Boone County and Republic No. 2 operation in Kanawha County. The judge did not suspend his ruling as it applies to a fourth mine, called Laxare East, in Boone County because the mine was already closed because of poor market conditions.

In a March 23 opinion, Chambers blocked four U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permits for Massey operations, ruling that agency officials had not fully evaluated the potential environmental damage before approving the operations.

Chambers cited an “alarming cumulative stream loss” to mining valley fills, and said that the corps “does not explain how the cumulative destruction of headwater streams already affected by mining in these watersheds will not contribute to an adverse impact on aquatic resources.”

In a follow-up order on April 6, Chambers had initially blocked further operations at the Aracoma Mine, prompting the layoffs.

Joe Lovett, a lawyer for the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition and other groups, said that his clients did not oppose a limited suspension of Chambers’ ruling pending an appeal by the industry to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals.

“We’re not here to take away anyone’s jobs, particularly when it concerns areas that have already been disturbed,” Lovett said.

To contact staff writer Ken Ward Jr., use e-mail or call 348-1702.

Back to top